Einstein's theory owes much of its notoriety to the so-called "twin paradox." Probably because people want to live longer. Its essence is simple: one of the twins remains on Earth, while the other on a spaceship rushes at a speed close to the speed of light to distant stars and, having reached them, returns to the sinful Earth with the same transport and at the same speed. As the formulas of the theory of relativity say, an astronaut will turn out to be much younger than a homebody brother when they meet.The paradox is a godsend for sensationalist journalists, and the subject of attacks by scandal–seeking alternatives. Let's imagine that there are not two twins, but six. And all of them simultaneously launch to the stars on all six sides of the world on twin spaceships. Everything from start to return is the same for them: acceleration, inertia, and braking. Space is isotropic, so there is no difference between south, west, north, east, top and bottom. But the relative speeds of astronauts who took off in opposite directions and their speeds relative to those who flew in relation to them at an angle of 90 and 270 degrees differ, and, consequently, the formulas of the theory of relativity will show a different difference in their age at the end of the flight. But everything is the same for everyone! Where would the difference come from? As is known, in the general theory of relativity (GR), time in a gravitational field flows slower than world time, counted by a clock at infinity. Changing the clock in points with different gravitational potential have been repeatedly tested in experiments with atomic and nuclear clocks. Therefore, planets located at different distances from the Sun have diverged in time by years over billions of years. How do they attract each other? It's the same as if you were having a full–fledged dialogue (not a monologue) with yourself yesterday! In Einstein's theory, there is a formula for the dependence of body mass on its speed. But how much mass? From the context of the main provisions of the theory, it follows – inertial. However, not a single theory, and not a single practice shows us a violation of the principle of equivalence of inertial and gravitational masses. Consequently, the gravitational mass will grow synchronously with the inertial mass. But we know very well that the farther away a galaxy is from us, the faster it is moving away from us. This means that, at the limit, all distant galaxies will gain speed and, consequently, mass, turning (in accordance with general relativity) the Galaxy into a "black hole". Then the edge of the universe can be represented as a continuous shell of only "black holes". Don't bring Lord, get to these places! It's scarier than the Big Bang! It is clear that from there our place in the universe will also look like a cluster of black holes! Einstein clearly overdid his theory. He describes the manifestation of gravity as a body rolling into a pit of curved space. And if we bend, for example, a board or just dig a pocket in the ground, then the ball will undoubtedly roll off the curved board and even roll into the pocket. But is the curvature of the board or the curvature of the pocket the reason for the slide? ball off the board or into the pocket? Not at all. Curvature is not the cause, but only the limiter of the path of movement, the cause of the ball rolling into the pocket is still the force of gravity, it has a physical essence and cause and is not generated by geometry. But it is almost impossible to bring this to the understanding of adherents of such theories of their falsity. This is practically the same as showing the contradictory mythology of any religion. Adherents of any religion because its myths are absurd, because it will not decrease. There are reasons for this, they are inherent in the peculiarities of human thinking, but it is more difficult to show them than to find contradictions in people's faith. THIS is hallucinatory physics, its scientific inconsistency has long been proven. It is used only in advertising PETE beer. Her popularity is entirely determined by the constant PR campaign of the Jewish media, which is increasing as the global Jewish capital grows.

Permanent link to this publication: