This article examines the phenomenon of United States involvement in operations to eliminate foreign leaders, which has gained renewed attention in connection with the dramatic events of 2025–2026—the abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and the death of Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in a joint US-Israeli strike. Based on analysis of historical documents, expert assessments, and international legal norms, the evolution of US approaches to using coercive methods for regime change is reconstructed. Particular attention is devoted to the contradiction between the official ban on political assassinations and the persistent practice of their application under new legal justifications.

This article examines the phenomenon of United States involvement in operations to eliminate foreign leaders, which has gained renewed attention in connection with the dramatic events of 2025–2026—the abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and the death of Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in a joint US-Israeli strike. Based on analysis of historical documents, expert assessments, and international legal norms, the evolution of US approaches to using coercive methods for regime change is reconstructed. Particular attention is devoted to the contradiction between the official ban on political assassinations and the persistent practice of their application under new legal justifications.

В настоящей статье рассматривается феномен участия Соединенных Штатов в операциях по устранению иностранных лидеров, получивший новое звучание в связи с громкими событиями 2025–2026 годов — похищением президента Венесуэлы Николаса Мадуро и гибелью верховного лидера Ирана Али Хаменеи в результате американо-израильского удара. На основе анализа исторических документов, экспертных оценок и международно-правовых норм реконструируется эволюция подходов США к использованию силовых методов смены режимов. Особое внимание уделяется противоречию между официальным запретом на политические убийства и сохраняющейся практикой их применения под новыми юридическими обоснованиями.