ONTOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE EXISTENTIAL ESCHATOLOGY OF ISLAM

A. M. FOMIN. A WAR WITH A SEQUEL. GREAT BRITAIN AND FRANCE IN THE STRUGGLE FOR THE "OTTOMAN INHERITANCE". 1918-1923

I. M. SMILYANSKAYA, M. B. VELIZHEV, AND E. B. SMILYANSKAYA. RUSSIA IN THE MEDITERRANEAN. CATHERINE THE GREAT'S ARCHIPELAGO EXPEDITION

MULTICULTURALISM AS POLITICS AND MULTICULTURALISM AS A HISTORICAL PHENOMENON

Maybe.., It is time to look into the folds of the divine chiton or veil, In order to understand the beginning of creation... A little cocky. He hopes, That's what was promised...

DAKHS OF CENTRAL ASIA IN THE ERA OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT: DATA FROM THE NARRATIVE TRADITION

THE EMERGENCE OF BIPOLARITY OR LEADERSHIP?

SOCIO-ECONOMIC POLICY OF THE JUSTICE AND DEVELOPMENT PARTY OF TURKEY: FROM POPULISM TO POPULARITY

Modern Pericles on their background is funny, and no pain.....

ALBANIAN FACTOR OF THE CRISIS IN THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA. THE DOUBLE STANDARDS POLITICS OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

DO LUSATIAN SERBS HAVE A FUTURE?

Dialectics is often called the tool of knowledge of nature. But, in the opinion of the author of this article, this tool is still as imperfect as the scissors would be imperfect, without the central screw uniting the two blades of this tool. This "cog" in dialectics is the fact that the "struggle" of opposites, which is the driving force behind the development of all processes of nature, is not absolute. "Struggle" is born when the dialectic system deviates from the state of equilibrium, and the goal of this "struggle" is to restore the lost equilibrium of the system.